A new interstellar object has set off alarms in the scientific community. It’s 3I/ATLAS, a comet speeding towards the Sun which some—including the controversial Avi Loeb—believe might be alien technology in disguise. Although most experts reject this possibility, the discussion has sparked a fascinating debate about science, speculation, and the limits of critical thinking.

3I/ATLAS: a deep-space visitor intriguing to science

Detected on 1 July 2025, 3I/ATLAS was confirmed in less than a day as the third interstellar object discovered. Its speed—over 210,000 km/h—and its trajectory, which cuts across the solar system plane at an unusual angle, immediately drew attention from the astronomical community.

Most data point to it being an ancient comet expelled from another star system. It measures roughly 24 km in diameter and is surrounded by a coma of gas and dust. Trajectory simulations suggest it could be 3 billion years older than our solar system, potentially making it the oldest comet ever observed.

The rarity of these objects has sparked excitement among scientists worldwide, who have begun studying it with advanced telescopes. Although the leading theory suggests it is a natural object, some do not rule out more provocative possibilities.

The alien hypothesis: a remote but stimulating possibility

Avi Loeb, a Harvard astronomer and public advocate for active search for extraterrestrial intelligence, is once again making headlines. Together with researchers from the Initiative for Interstellar Studies, he published a paper suggesting that 3I/ATLAS might not be a natural object, but rather alien technology sent by an advanced—and possibly dangerous—civilization with observational or intervention purposes.

The article, posted on arXiv, does not present direct proof—it explores the idea as a thought experiment. Loeb highlights “suspicious” characteristics, like the unusual orbit and the fact that it will pass relatively close to Mars, Jupiter, and Venus. He even suggests these close flybys could be a strategy to deploy devices without detection.

The hypothesis is framed within the “dark forest” theory, which posits that advanced civilizations remain silent to avoid being discovered by cosmic predators. While many dismiss these ideas as bordering on science fiction, Loeb argues that exploring them keeps scientific curiosity alive.

Crucially, the author himself concedes that the most likely outcome is that 3I/ATLAS is a natural interstellar object, probably a comet. His intent is not to prove it is alien, but to remind that it’s worth questioning assumptions.

What the scientific community says: a natural explanation fits better

Several astronomers have observed a fuzzy coma surrounding 3I/ATLAS, strongly suggesting it’s a comet. While certain volatiles haven’t yet been detected, that’s expected given its current distance from the Sun. Volatile compounds typically become visible only as the object draws closer.

Experts such as Darryl Seligman from Michigan State University—who led the first quantitative study of the object—and Samantha Lawler from the University of Regina, emphasize there’s nothing so far to suggest an artificial origin. Interstellar objects are rare, but entirely consistent with our understanding; similar objects have also been ejected from our own solar system over time.

Although sending a probe to intercept 3I/ATLAS would be extremely difficult due to its speed, that does not imply a deliberate intent—it reflects current technological limitations.

Astronomers like Chris Lintott of Oxford—who participated in simulations of the object’s galactic origin—consider proposing it as an alien probe without solid evidence diverts attention from serious research and risks trivializing the work of dozens of teams analyzing real, valuable data.

Conclusion

The case of 3I/ATLAS presents a compelling dilemma: how far is it appropriate to speculate when the evidence points elsewhere? On one hand, most data support the natural comet hypothesis. On the other, the extraterrestrial hypothesis, though unlikely, serves a purpose: to keep the spirit of questioning alive within science.

Avi Loeb and his colleagues may be wrong, but their proposal is a powerful reminder that science can—and should—make space for unconventional ideas, so long as they are framed rigorously and acknowledge their own limitations.

The universe remains full of mysteries. Perhaps 3I/ATLAS isn’t an alien probe, but its fleeting passage has already made an impact: it invites us to look at the sky not only with data, but with questions.

Reference:

• Discovery And Preliminary Characterization Of A Third Interstellar Object: 3I/ATLAS. Link.
• Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology? Link.

Esta entrada también está disponible en: Español